Skip to main content
Developer Tools

Full-stack observability platform for monitoring and troubleshooting.

New Relic Review 2026

4.2/5
Developer ToolsBest Value
4.2/ 5.0(1580 reviews)
Reviewed by PilotStack TeamPublished July 21, 2026How we score

New Relic ingests application, infrastructure, and log telemetry into one account, then serves dashboards, queries, and alerts from it.

Quick Answer

Full-stack observability platform for monitoring and troubleshooting.

TL;DR

  • Billing counts users and ingested data rather than hosts, which suits environments with many machines and a small monitoring group.
  • The free tier is recorded here with 100 GB of monthly ingestion, one full-platform user, and basic APM features.
  • Deployment events line up against performance data: the GitHub review in this repository records New Relic integrations that correlate the two.
  • Ingestion volume drives cost, and this repository's pricing analysis names exceeding the included data allowance as the trap that inflates the bill.
  • The stored price band of $0.25/hour does not match a conventional subscription list price, so this page cannot confirm what a plan costs.

Key Takeaways

  • Overall rating: 4.2/5 from 1,580 reviews
  • Pricing: $0.25/hour (Freemium)
  • Best for: New Relic excels at application performance monitoring and metered data ingestion
  • Consider alternatives if: Ingestion volume drives cost, and this repository's pricing analysis names exceeding the included data allowance as the trap that inflates the bill.
  • Common use cases: Use New Relic for developer tools workflows, Team collaboration and developer tools
  • Comparison section below: how New Relic sits against other tools
  • Scored across 9 recorded categories on a 1-5 scale — the overall rating is their mean
Who should buy
  • •Billing counts users and ingested data rather than hosts, which suits environments with many machines and a small monitoring group.
  • •The free tier is recorded here with 100 GB of monthly ingestion, one full-platform user, and basic APM features.
  • •Deployment events line up against performance data: the GitHub review in this repository records New Relic integrations that correlate the two.
Who should avoid
  • •Ingestion volume drives cost, and this repository's pricing analysis names exceeding the included data allowance as the trap that inflates the bill.
  • •The stored price band of $0.25/hour does not match a conventional subscription list price, so this page cannot confirm what a plan costs.
  • •Value arrives only after instrumentation: applications, hosts, and log sources must be sending data before queries and alerts mean anything.
Visit Website Compare alternatives Editorial review · Recorded data

Pros & Cons

Pros

63%
  • Billing counts users and ingested data rather than hosts, which suits environments with many machines and a small monitoring group.
  • The free tier is recorded here with 100 GB of monthly ingestion, one full-platform user, and basic APM features.
  • Deployment events line up against performance data: the GitHub review in this repository records New Relic integrations that correlate the two.
  • Serverless and frontend signals reach the same account — the Netlify review records function performance via log streaming, the Vercel review records source maps uploaded at build time.
  • Dashboards, custom queries, and alert thresholds sit on the same stored telemetry, so one instrumented service answers several questions.

Cons

37%
  • Ingestion volume drives cost, and this repository's pricing analysis names exceeding the included data allowance as the trap that inflates the bill.
  • The stored price band of $0.25/hour does not match a conventional subscription list price, so this page cannot confirm what a plan costs.
  • Value arrives only after instrumentation: applications, hosts, and log sources must be sending data before queries and alerts mean anything.

Third-Party Reviews

New Relic carries a 4.2/5 rating across 1,580 reviews in the PilotStack dataset. Compare recent user feedback on G2, Capterra, and TrustRadius before deciding.

Rating Overview

4.2
Overall Rating

Mean of 9 category ratings

8
Available Features

Out of 8 total

Freemium
Pricing Model
9
Review Sections

In-depth coverage

Category Ratings

FeatUsabPricSuppSecuIntePerfDocuScal
Features4.3/5
Usability4.4/5
Pricing4.1/5
Support4.2/5
Security4.5/5
Integrations4.0/5
Performance4.3/5
Documentation4.2/5
Scalability4.0/5

Company Overview

About New Relic

Legal Name
New Relic Inc.
Platforms
Web

Security & Compliance

Security certifications, compliance standards, and data protection measures for New Relic.

Capabilities

Feature capabilities and platform functionality offered by New Relic.

API

REST API for New Relic

Webhooks

Event-driven webhook integrations

Automation

Workflow automation capabilities

Collaboration

Team collaboration and sharing

Analytics

Usage analytics and reporting

Permissions

Role-based access controls

Import

Data import capabilities

Export

Data export and migration tools

Use Cases & Fit

Who New Relic is best suited for, common workflows, and typical team profiles.

Primary Use Cases

  • •Use New Relic for developer tools workflows
  • •Team collaboration and developer tools

Secondary Use Cases

  • •Process automation
  • •Reporting and analytics
Ideal Company Size
1-1,000 employees
Best Industries
TechnologySaaSProfessional Services
Typical Teams
Developer Tools
Common Workflows
Daily developer tools managementTeam coordination
Beginner Suitability
High
Enterprise Suitability
High

Pricing Plans

Detailed pricing breakdown for New Relic plans.

PlanPrice
Free$0 /Free tier
Starter$10 /per user/month
ProRecommended$25 /per user/month
EnterpriseCustom pricing with dedicated support

Before You Buy

Start with a trial project

Create a sample project with real code to test the platform end-to-end before committing to a team rollout.

Involve your team

Have at least three engineers from different skill levels use the trial independently. A tool that only your senior dev can configure creates bus-factor risk.

Check the exit

Review the data export capabilities before committing. Can you export all your data in a machine-readable format (CSV, JSON, API access) without vendor assistance? Lock-in is a real cost.

Budget for setup

Most organizations underestimate implementation time by 2-3x. Budget for internal setup labor, data migration, team training, and workflow configuration before projecting ROI timelines.

Compiled under our published methodology from a library of 151 B2B SaaS reviews across 12 categories.

New Relic in brief

New Relic is a full-stack observability service: agents and integrations send application, infrastructure, and log data to the vendor's cloud, and dashboards, queries, and alerts are drawn from that stored telemetry. This repository files it under Developer Tools at 4.2/5 from 1,580 reviews, names it as an example of the monitoring segment of that category, ranks it fifth on its monitoring tools page, and places it fourth among error tracking tools. Its recorded audience runs from small teams to enterprise.

What this repository records New Relic ingesting

New Relic's scope is easiest to read off the integration notes this repository holds in other reviews, which describe several distinct entry points feeding a single account. Application, host, log, and frontend signals arrive separately and are then queried together, which is what the word full-stack is referring to here. The specific channels recorded across those files are these:

  • Application monitoring: the free tier is recorded with basic APM features, and code-level visibility is recorded as a paid-tier capability.
  • Dashboards: custom dashboards appear in the monitoring pricing analysis as a paid-tier capability.
  • Alerts: AI-driven alerts appear in the same analysis among the features paid tiers add.
  • Deployments: the GitHub review records New Relic integrations that correlate deployments with performance data.
  • Serverless functions: the Netlify review records function performance reaching New Relic through log streaming.
  • Frontend builds: the Vercel review records New Relic connecting through Vercel's integration marketplace with source maps uploaded during builds.

Billing by user and by volume

The monitoring pricing analysis in this repository describes New Relic as having moved from per-server pricing to a per-user model with data ingestion limits. In that shape a large fleet watched by a small group bills against the group rather than the fleet, which is the advantage the analysis records for teams with many hosts and few engineers. The limit works the other way: ingested data is metered monthly, and the analysis names exceeding that allowance as the pricing trap, because overage charges accumulate on top of the subscription.

Querying and alerting on stored telemetry

Once telemetry is stored, it is exposed to queries. New Relic's query language, NRQL, is a SQL-style syntax for selecting metrics, events, and logs over a time window, and dashboards are assembled from those queries rather than from pre-built reports. Alerts attach to the same language, so a threshold written for a chart and a threshold written for a notification describe one series rather than two definitions that can disagree. This repository documents neither query performance nor retention windows, so both should be checked with the vendor rather than assumed.

Ingestion cost and coverage limits

Constraints worth stating before an evaluation. Ingestion comes first: because data volume drives cost, teams should estimate logs, metrics, and traces before selecting a tier, and the analysis in this repository recommends exactly that. Coverage versus depth comes second — the product spans applications, hosts, logs, errors, and serverless functions, which is broad, but each surface still needs instrumentation before it produces anything worth reading. The stored band on this page, $0.25/hour, does not map to a normal subscription, so budgeting has to start from the vendor's current numbers.

Delivery model and what the dataset omits

New Relic is delivered as a vendor-hosted cloud service: telemetry leaves your infrastructure and is queried from systems the vendor operates, which is the first question a security review asks about a product of this type. Agents and account access are controlled centrally rather than on hardware you own. Nothing behind this review documents a compliance certification for New Relic — nothing about audit reports, data residency, or sub-processors is stored here — so those must be read from current vendor documentation and confirmed against the tier under consideration.

New Relic next to Grafana and Datadog

The head-to-head files stored with this review place New Relic at 4.2/5 above JFrog at 4.1 and SourceForge at 3.5, and below Grafana at 4.5, CircleCI at 4.3, Datadog at 4.6, Docker at 4.6, and GitHub at 4.7. The architecturally useful comparison is Grafana: New Relic sells collection together with the interface, while Grafana sits over stores you already operate. Datadog leads this repository's monitoring ranking with New Relic fifth, and the pricing blog here treats per-host, per-user, and per-event billing as the axis that actually separates these products.

Who this points at

The per-user-plus-ingestion model points at a specific buyer: an organization with substantial infrastructure and few people watching it, where charging by engineer rather than by machine is the cheaper shape. Teams that already run their own metrics and log stores and only want a query layer fit less naturally, because the product's value starts with data arriving in its cloud. Projects carrying heavy log volume against a fixed budget should model ingestion first; this repository's pricing analysis treats that number as the one that decides the bill.

Basis of this page

Every statement above is drawn from this repository's monitoring pricing analysis, its category and ranking pages, integration notes in neighboring reviews, and vendor-published description material; none of it comes from operating New Relic. The evidence supports a clear shape — a cloud observability service billing by user and by ingested data — and leaves several specifics unrecorded, including current list pricing and certifications. The stored rating is 4.2/5 across 1,580 reviews.

Feature Breakdown

Core Features

1/1 available
Application performance monitoring
Agents instrument services, and the free tier covers basic APM while code-level visibility is recorded as a paid-tier capability.
Available

Integrations Features

2/2 available
Deployment correlation
The GitHub review in this repository records New Relic integrations that line deployments up against performance data.
Available
Serverless function telemetry
Function performance reaches New Relic through log streaming, as recorded in the Netlify review stored with this dataset.
Available

How New Relic Compares

Comparison cards generated from this site's recorded tool profiles. Ratings, pricing and security entries are recorded values rather than independently verified figures.

New Relic vs Sentry

New Relic is best for use new relic for developer tools workflows, while Sentry excels at use sentry for developer tools workflows

vsAPI
vsWebhooks
vsAutomation
vsCollaboration

Both start around the same price point

Comparable security compliance

Full comparison

New Relic vs Postman

New Relic is best for use new relic for developer tools workflows, while Postman excels at use postman for developer tools workflows

vsAPI
vsWebhooks
vsAutomation
vsCollaboration

Both start around the same price point

Comparable security compliance

Full comparison

New Relic vs CircleCI

New Relic is best for use new relic for developer tools workflows, while CircleCI excels at use circleci for developer tools workflows

vsAPI
vsWebhooks
vsAutomation
vsCollaboration

Both start around the same price point

Comparable security compliance

Sources & Methodology

Each page shows an overall rating plus 9 recorded category ratings on a 1-5 scale, all drawn from the PilotStack dataset. The overall rating is the mean of those category ratings rounded to one decimal. Review counts, pricing and feature availability are recorded as of the dates shown above and may change. See our full methodology for how ratings are calculated, what each page is sourced from, and our editorial independence policy.

Content updated: October 2, 2026 · No vendor payment or sponsorship influenced this review · We may earn affiliate commission on purchases made through links on this site.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does New Relic charge?

By users and by data ingested. The monitoring pricing analysis in this repository records a move from per-server pricing to a per-user model with monthly ingestion limits applied on top.

What does New Relic include without paying?

The same analysis records 100 GB of monthly ingestion, one full-platform user, and basic APM features on the free tier, with paid tiers raising limits and adding members.

Why does the New Relic price band on this page look unusual?

Our dataset stores $0.25/hour for New Relic, which does not match a standard subscription list price. Treat it as unconfirmed and check the vendor's published pricing instead.

How does New Relic compare with Grafana here?

New Relic scores 4.2/5 against Grafana's 4.5 in the stored head-to-head records, and the two differ in shape: New Relic sells collection with the interface, Grafana visualizes stores you run.

Does New Relic fit a small team?

The per-user model described in this repository's analysis is cheapest when hosts outnumber monitoring engineers, which points at infrastructure-heavy teams with few users.

Prices and ratings are approximate and may vary.

Related Software & Resources

Related Categories